quinara: Spike drinking from a blood bag. (Spike blood bag)
[personal profile] quinara
So, the OTW has found itself in its semi-annual clusterfuck. Or, not really, but it's currently having its autumnal donation drive which seems to be interacting in an odd way with its election process (namely, no one who becomes a member during the current drive will be able to vote). The more interesting point is that despite now asking fandom for $175,000, the organisation does not seem to have realised that at some point it might need to produce an annual budget. It has raised $90,000 in less than a week (ETA: and $10,000 TODAY), but has no agreed aims about how it intends to spend the money. Servers, one assumes from communications, but as the donation page says that the money is going to the OTW as a whole, it could be spent on anything: it could be decided that it has to be spent on something in the next six months, even if there is no current need. People point this out, but there is not really any decent response provided.

Certain commentators (though not part of the organisation's running staff) seem to be of the impression that this is not important, and if people don't trust the OTW they should just not get involved. Actual staff seem to be under the impression that a full budget would require the disclosure of bank account details or some nonsense I can't quite make sense of. I made a comment on AO3 and a different comment on tumblr - but what I thought it was worth journalling about is how this affects all of us who produce fannish stuff, including fic and comments on fic. Because as far as the OTW is marketing this donation drive as being about the AO3, we are all assets of the OTW. In financial terms, we are what allow the organisation to make a case to bring in more money, whether we are full members or not. The organisation by constitution is non-profit and makes no money, but as its members, staff and board derive satisfaction from its existence, all of us that contribute to the AO3's success contribute to that satisfaction. And I think it should be embarrassing for the organisation to have its finances in such disorder that it cannot satisfy its assets/asset-providers, let alone its donors.

I don't really know what the point of this post is, but I wanted to document this clusterfuckery in something that is more substantial than a tumblr post. Also make a note that assets of an organisation should not be treated as its cash cows without any respect for the labour which makes fandom a viably organisable thing in the first place. OK, the sysadmins are volunteers, but so are the writers and reviewers. Even if fic were banned from everywhere on the interwebs besides the AO3 we would go on, and any charitable institution disrespects its constituents at its peril.

(no subject)

Date: 12/10/2015 00:25 (UTC)
snickfic: (Default)
From: [personal profile] snickfic
I've only been sort of paying attention to the OTW thing, so maybe you can answer this question for me: why is it now that we're suddenly worrying about the budget or lack thereof now? Not that they shouldn't have one, but they've been both fundraising and failing to produce a budget for a long time.

Don't get me wrong, I'm really pleased that people are finally discussing some of the OTW's failures in public (and in namespace, in particular - I've seen discussion in anon spaces for several years), because maybe they will finally get fixed with some public attention on them. I'm just confused as to what set it all off.

(no subject)

Date: 13/10/2015 15:36 (UTC)
snickfic: (Default)
From: [personal profile] snickfic

That does all make sense. Thanks for the run-down! That is a much clearer picture than I had before - like I said, I've kind of been on the periphery all this time, and wasn't sure what the latest was. And yeah, becoming a member but still not being about to vote would be pretty frustrating. I can see the sense in it - you don't want to leave someone the option of sweeping in and gaming the election - but it does lead to other questions.


quinara: Sheep on a hillside with a smiley face. (Default)

December 2015

67 89101112


Page Summary

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit